Expertise.com

2024

Last updated:

Best Employment Lawyers in Redding

Our Recommended Top 3

We did the research for you!

  • Licensing
  • User Reviews
  • Mystery Shopping Calls

Our goal is to connect people with the best local professionals. We scored Redding Employment Lawyers on more than 25 variables across five categories, and analyzed the results to give you a hand-picked list of the best.

36Reviewed

22Curated

3Top Picks

Learn about our selection process.

Providers

featured provider = Featured Provider

1265 Willis Street, Redding, CA 96001

Expertise.com Rating

Review Sources

Google
5.0 (10)
Yelp
3.5 (3)
Avvo
5.0 (2)

Why choose this provider?

Founded in 1988, Reese, Smalley, Wiseman, & Schweitzer LLP provides legal counsel and representation for clients in Redding and throughout its nearby communities. The firm handles cases in several legal areas, including employment law. Its attorneys represent companies that are facing employee-related administrative issues or litigation. Other practice areas include personal injury, trust litigation, and estate planning. Reese, Smalley, Wiseman, & Schweitzer LLP has been provided with an AV-Preeminent peer rating by Martindale-Hubbell.

  • Unemployment

Attorney Information

Attorney NameBar StatusExperience
Howard Schweitzer - PartnerActive55 yrs

2851 Park Marina Drive, Redding, CA 96001

Expertise.com Rating

Review Sources

Google
5.0 (4)
Yelp
5.0 (4)

Why choose this provider?

Redding-based Maire & Deedon represents individuals and businesses in employment law cases. Some of the employment law cases that the law practice handles are workplace discrimination, failure to accommodate, and retaliation and whistleblower protections. The law firm also covers other practice areas like personal injury, public entity litigation, and commercial and business litigation. Its team of lawyers is comprised of founding principal Wayne H. Maire, partner Patrick L. Deedon, partner Jerralk Keith Pickering II, and three associate lawyers. Maire & Deedon has been in practice for more than 30 years.

  • Whistleblower
  • Discrimination
  • Sexual Harassment

Attorney Information

Attorney NameBar StatusExperience
Wayne Maire - Founding PrincipalActive45 yrs

2770 Pioneer Dr., Redding, CA 96001

Expertise.com Rating

Review Sources

Avvo
5.0 (4)

Why choose this provider?

Fortney Nash LLP is a private law firm based in Redding. Its areas of practice are court litigations, employment law, and business law. It provides legal support to clients facing workplace discrimination, wrongful discharge, and contract disputes. The firm has also represented clients in trade secret litigations that aided in their transition from one company to the competitor. It has also assisted in securing more than $10 million worth of recovery claims and disputes in insurance and contracts.

  • Discrimination
  • Wrongful Termination

Attorney Information

Attorney NameBar StatusExperience
Micah Nash - PartnerActive18 yrs

Disclaimer:  Consumers utilizing Expertise.com are free to communicate and contract with any lawyer they choose. Expertise.com is not involved in the confidential attorney-client relationship. Featured lawyers pay a reasonable advertising cost to market their legal services with Expertise.com and must meet similar selection criteria as other lawyers. All cases are different. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

FAQs

  • What is the non-emergency contact number for the local police station in Redding, California?

    The Redding Police Department can be contacted at 530-225-4200 for non-emergency concerns.

  • Does the principle of at-will employment in Redding allow employers to terminate employees filing workplace discrimination claims?

    No, the principle of at-will employment in Redding does not allow employers to terminate employees solely for filing grievances regarding workplace discrimination. Such retaliatory actions are considered illegal and fall under prohibited conduct. Employees are safeguarded by laws prohibiting employers from penalizing them for exercising their rights and seeking justice in workplace discrimination cases.

  • What are the requirements to build a strong retaliation case in Redding?

    To build a strong retaliation case in Redding, validating allegations with concrete proof is crucial. Three components must be confirmed:

    • The employer's retaliatory conduct due to an employee's actions
    • Engagement in a safeguarded behavior by the employee
    • The employer's retaliation as a direct consequence of this safeguarded action

    Skilled attorneys specializing in workplace retaliation can effectively gather, organize, and present the requisite evidence.

  • When are non-exempt workers in Redding entitled to receive double pay?

    In Redding, non-exempt workers are entitled to twice their usual pay when exceeding 12 hours of labor in a single day or working over eight hours on their seventh successive day. However, certain employees, such as nurses, personal aides, individuals in commercial fishing, specific regulated drivers, and employees of local and state government, are not subject to these double-time wage regulations.

  • What protection do workers age 40 or older have in Redding against employment discrimination?

    In Redding, the law mandates fair treatment for workers aged 40 or older, shielding them from bias in any employment aspect, as enforced by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Additionally, the federal Older Workers Benefit Protection Act further safeguards older employees, providing 21 days to scrutinize documents that might relinquish their rights, like severance contracts.

  • What must Redding employers do for employees with disabilities?

    In Redding, it is a legal requirement for businesses employing a minimum of five individuals to make necessary adjustments for those with physical or mental impairments. Overlooking this duty equates to disability bias. Nevertheless, an employer retains the right to decline the request if such accommodations result in substantial hardship or monetary burdens relative to the company's resources and tax benefits.