Expertise.com

Best Employment Lawyers in Redding

2024

We did the research for you!

  • Licensing
  • User Reviews
  • Mystery Shopping Calls
Employment Lawyers FAQs 〉

Providers

Last updated:

Website
1265 Willis Street, Redding, CA 96001
  • Unemployment

Why choose this provider?

Founded in 1988, Reese, Smalley, Wiseman, & Schweitzer LLP provides legal counsel and representation for clients in Redding and throughout its nearby communities. The firm handles cases in several legal areas, including employment law. Its attorneys represent companies that are facing employee-related administrative issues or litigation. Other practice areas include personal injury, trust litigation, and estate planning. Reese, Smalley, Wiseman, & Schweitzer LLP has been provided with an AV-Preeminent peer rating by Martindale-Hubbell.

Attorney Information

Attorney NamesExperience
Howard Schweitzer - Partner55 yrs

Reputation:

We scour the internet for reviews from well-known resources. Each provider is evaluated based on the quality and quantity of their reviews, their presence on multiple review sites, and their average minimum rating.
4.7
Google
5.0 / 5 (10)
Yelp
3.5 / 5 (3)
Avvo
5.0 / 5 (2)

Professionalism:

We hire mystery shoppers to call our providers anonymously and evaluate them. Providers who respond quickly, answer questions thoroughly, and communicate politely score higher.
5.0
Responsiveness
Friendliness
Helpfulness
Detail

Website
2851 Park Marina Drive, Redding, CA 96001
  • Whistleblower
  • Discrimination
  • Sexual Harassment

Why choose this provider?

Redding-based Maire & Deedon represents individuals and businesses in employment law cases. Some of the employment law cases that the law practice handles are workplace discrimination, failure to accommodate, and retaliation and whistleblower protections. The law firm also covers other practice areas like personal injury, public entity litigation, and commercial and business litigation. Its team of lawyers is comprised of founding principal Wayne H. Maire, partner Patrick L. Deedon, partner Jerralk Keith Pickering II, and three associate lawyers. Maire & Deedon has been in practice for more than 30 years.

Attorney Information

Attorney NamesExperience
Wayne Maire - Founding Principal45 yrs

Reputation:

We scour the internet for reviews from well-known resources. Each provider is evaluated based on the quality and quantity of their reviews, their presence on multiple review sites, and their average minimum rating.
5.0
Google
5.0 / 5 (4)
Yelp
5.0 / 5 (4)

Professionalism:

We hire mystery shoppers to call our providers anonymously and evaluate them. Providers who respond quickly, answer questions thoroughly, and communicate politely score higher.
4.5
Responsiveness
Friendliness
Helpfulness
Detail

Website
1890 Park Marina Drive, Redding, CA 96001
  • Discrimination

Why choose this provider?

Established in 1999, Altemus & Wagner, Attorneys At Law, is a practice that serves clients in and around the Redding area. It represents employees dealing with state and federal employment law issues, such as discrimination, wage and hour disputes, sexual harassment, whistleblower litigation, and wrongful discharge. It also handles personal injury, including automobile accidents, assault and battery, aviation accidents, pesticide exposure, and medical malpractice. The firm's partner, Stewart C. Altemus, has been practicing law since 1981.

Attorney Information

Attorney NamesExperience
Stewart Altemus - Partner43 yrs

Reputation:

We scour the internet for reviews from well-known resources. Each provider is evaluated based on the quality and quantity of their reviews, their presence on multiple review sites, and their average minimum rating.
5.0
Google
5.0 / 5 (2)
Yelp
5.0 / 5 (2)

Professionalism:

We hire mystery shoppers to call our providers anonymously and evaluate them. Providers who respond quickly, answer questions thoroughly, and communicate politely score higher.
5.0
Responsiveness
Friendliness
Helpfulness
Detail

Website
2770 Pioneer Dr., Redding, CA 96001
  • Discrimination
  • Wrongful Termination

Why choose this provider?

Fortney Nash LLP is a private law firm based in Redding. Its areas of practice are court litigations, employment law, and business law. It provides legal support to clients facing workplace discrimination, wrongful discharge, and contract disputes. The firm has also represented clients in trade secret litigations that aided in their transition from one company to the competitor. It has also assisted in securing more than $10 million worth of recovery claims and disputes in insurance and contracts.

Attorney Information

Attorney NamesExperience
Micah Nash - Partner18 yrs

Reputation:

We scour the internet for reviews from well-known resources. Each provider is evaluated based on the quality and quantity of their reviews, their presence on multiple review sites, and their average minimum rating.
5.0
Avvo
5.0 / 5 (4)

Professionalism:

We hire mystery shoppers to call our providers anonymously and evaluate them. Providers who respond quickly, answer questions thoroughly, and communicate politely score higher.
5.0
Responsiveness
Friendliness
Helpfulness
Detail

Disclaimer:  Consumers utilizing Expertise.com are free to communicate and contract with any lawyer they choose. Expertise.com is not involved in the confidential attorney-client relationship. Featured lawyers pay a reasonable advertising cost to market their legal services withExpertise.com and must meet similar selection criteria as other lawyers. All cases are different. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What is the non-emergency contact number for the local police station in Redding, California?

    The Redding Police Department can be contacted at 530-225-4200 for non-emergency concerns.

  • Does the principle of at-will employment in Redding allow employers to terminate employees filing workplace discrimination claims?

    No, the principle of at-will employment in Redding does not allow employers to terminate employees solely for filing grievances regarding workplace discrimination. Such retaliatory actions are considered illegal and fall under prohibited conduct. Employees are safeguarded by laws prohibiting employers from penalizing them for exercising their rights and seeking justice in workplace discrimination cases.

  • What are the requirements to build a strong retaliation case in Redding?

    To build a strong retaliation case in Redding, validating allegations with concrete proof is crucial. Three components must be confirmed:

    • The employer's retaliatory conduct due to an employee's actions
    • Engagement in a safeguarded behavior by the employee
    • The employer's retaliation as a direct consequence of this safeguarded action

    Skilled attorneys specializing in workplace retaliation can effectively gather, organize, and present the requisite evidence.

  • When are non-exempt workers in Redding entitled to receive double pay?

    In Redding, non-exempt workers are entitled to twice their usual pay when exceeding 12 hours of labor in a single day or working over eight hours on their seventh successive day. However, certain employees, such as nurses, personal aides, individuals in commercial fishing, specific regulated drivers, and employees of local and state government, are not subject to these double-time wage regulations.

  • What protection do workers age 40 or older have in Redding against employment discrimination?

    In Redding, the law mandates fair treatment for workers aged 40 or older, shielding them from bias in any employment aspect, as enforced by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Additionally, the federal Older Workers Benefit Protection Act further safeguards older employees, providing 21 days to scrutinize documents that might relinquish their rights, like severance contracts.

  • What must Redding employers do for employees with disabilities?

    In Redding, it is a legal requirement for businesses employing a minimum of five individuals to make necessary adjustments for those with physical or mental impairments. Overlooking this duty equates to disability bias. Nevertheless, an employer retains the right to decline the request if such accommodations result in substantial hardship or monetary burdens relative to the company's resources and tax benefits.